United States v. Geozos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
David Geozos appeals the 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We affirm the sentence because Geozos is subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of fifteen years under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e).
The district court correctly concluded that Geozos is an armed career criminal because he had at least three previous convictions for violent felonies. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). Geozos does not dispute that his previous conviction for assault qualifies as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gary Lamont Williams, A/k/a/ Hiriam King WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Esteban Hernandez-CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. David GeozosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017