Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Bie
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Local telephone companies such as Wisconsin Bell have a degree of monopoly power because of the cost to a competitor of duplicating the grid of telephone wires and switching equipment that constitutes a local telephone network. The competitor will find it difficult to compete unless it is interconnected with the local network. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 provides a machinery for encouraging interconnection. The competitor can require the local phone company to negotiate, in good faith, an agreement authorizing interconnection on mutually agreeable terms. If…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Verizon North, Inc. v. John G. Strand, Chairman John C. Shea, Commissioner and David A. Svanda, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. GTE Northwest, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- At&t Communications of Illinois, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. And Ameritech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. v. Telecommunications Regulatory BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Verizon North Inc. v. John G. Strand, Coast to Coast Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- MPower Communications Corp. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.