Legal Opinion

People v. Crimmins

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1985PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The court in submitting the voluntariness of the confession to the jury did not err in refusing to charge that the police had an obligation to let family members or friends communicate with a competent adult in custody (cf. People v Townsend, 33 NY2d 37; People v Bevilacqua, 45 NY2d 508; People v Casassa, 49 NY2d 668; People v Fuschino, 59 NY2d 91). We note that there was no evidence that these persons had retained counsel for the defendant. Nor was there any evidence that the defendant sought the assistance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CasassaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. FuschinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. BevilacquaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. PageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. CasianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. SanabriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API