Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Bond
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 3, 2010No. 501 CAPPublished
Application for Reargument
1Opinion of the Court
989 A.2d 1274 (2010)
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee
v.
Aquil BOND, Appellant.
No. 501 CAP.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 3, 2010.
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 3rd day of March 2010, the Application for Reargument is hereby DENIED.
Chief Justice CASTILLE files a Concurring Statement.
3ConcurrenceChief Justice Castille
I join the denial of the application for reargument and write only to respond to appellant's assertion, forwarded for the first time on reargument, that the claim he faults this Court for finding waived in fact was unwaivable. He further alleges that the claim "was explicitly and implicitly reached" by this Court even…
4Cases cited7 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Bronshtein v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.