Legal Opinion

Roofner v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1978No. Appeal, No. 1344 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

Petitioner (claimant) appeals the order of respondent Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which vacated a referee’s award of benefits to him under Section 108(n) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Compensation Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Section 1 of the Act of October 17, 1972, P.L. 930, as amended, 77 P.S. §27.1 (n). We affirm the Board.

Claimant had been employed by respondent-employer (employer) as a laborer for several years. Among his duties was the handling of wooden barrels which had accumulated dust and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McHale v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Colt Industries v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Purex, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Crucible Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Sullivan v. Poggenburg, No. 0302170 (Dec. 1, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API