Legal Opinion
Scussel v. Balter
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 8, 1980No. 78-997PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
386 So.2d 1227 (1980)
John J. SCUSSEL and Paul Wolf, Appellants,
v.
David BALTER, Appellee.
No. 78-997.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 8, 1980.
Rehearing Denied September 4, 1980.
James O. Nelson, Miami, for appellants.
Bailey & Dawes and Guy B. Bailey, Jr., Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
SCHWARTZ, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment for compensatory and punitive damages entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding that the appellant John Scussel,[1] one of the defendants below, had maliciously interfered with an advantageous business relationship…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ethyl Corp. v. BalterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. HornIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- United Yacht Brokers, Inc. v. GillespieSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Morgan v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- John B. Reid & Associates, Inc. v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Georgetown ManorSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Ethyl Corp. v. BalterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Salit v. Ruden, McClosky, Smith, SchusterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Landry v. HornsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.