Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 26, 2011No. 10-11CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Plaintiff Katherine Brooks filed this Equal Pay Act action against the Department of the Navy on January 6, 2010. Ms. Brooks contends that she was paid less than a male for equal work in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (2006). Trial was held May 4-5, 2011. For reasons explained below, we conclude that there was no violation of the Equal Pay Act.

FACTS1

Six witnesses appeared at trial. The first was plaintiff, Ms. Katherine Brooks. Second was her selected comparator, Mr. John Prop-ster. Third was Mr. Roy Hoyt, Ms. Brooks’ direct supervisor for several months at the Center…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  3. Yant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Ellison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. CARTEE-HARING v. CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. Marinello v. CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Spellers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Spellers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API