Legal Opinion
Fur-Lex Realty, Inc. v. Lindsay
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarry B. Frank, J.
The defendant city officials move for
summary judgment dismissing the complaint herein as against them. The primary issue is the claimed illegality of a certain lease agreement entered into on April 10, 1970 between the City of New York and 41 Madison Company, the then owner of property located at the southeast corner of Madison Avenue and Twenty-sixth Street, adjacent to the court building which houses the Appellate Division, First Department. Plaintiff Fur-Lex Realty Inc. (hereinafter FurLex) formerly owned the unimproved lot adjoining the easterly end of the courthouse on East Twenty-fifth…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Gerzof v. SweeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paerdegat Boat & Racquet Club, Inc. v. ZarrelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Vitucci v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Mainer v. Canal Authority of StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Bottillo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Brody v. MoanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.