Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 4, 1999No. 91,370PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

730 So.2d 265 (1999)

Gregory R. DIXON, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 91,370

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 4, 1999.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Roberta G. Mandel, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, for Respondent

PARIENTE, J.

We have for review a decision addressing the following question certified to be of great public importance:

WHETHER APPELLANT'S RULE 3.850 MOTION SEEKING RETROACTIVE BENEFIT OF HALE V. STATE,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. DuggerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API