In Re Mannings
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROBERT L. EISEN, Bankruptcy Judge.
At issue in the present case is whether the court may approve over the objection of the mortgagee a modified Chapter 13 plan where the debtors (“the Mannings”) have failed to make current mortgage payments, but have offered testimony that circumstances which prevented them from making timely mortgage payments have changed, and where the modification proposes increased payments to cure the post filing arrearages. For the reasons set forth in this memorandum the court will allow the debtor to modify the plan and “cram down” the modification…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ronald E. Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- In Re Mary E. Johnson, Debtor. Mary E. Johnson v. Vanguard Holding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- In Re SimpkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
- 10 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1280, Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,929 in the Matter of Hugh R. Clark and Joanne Clark, Debtors-Appellants. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Ukrainian Savings and Loan Ass'n v. Trident Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re ShariyfDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- In Re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1989
- In Re BereolosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
- Metmor Financial, Inc. v. Bailey (In Re Bailey)District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1988
- In re Brian T.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2017