Legal Opinion

In Re Davis

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided November 21, 1989No. 14-24671PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE DEBTORS’ MOTION TO AMEND PLAN TO CURE POSTCONFIRMATION DEFAULTS IN PAYMENTS SECURED BY PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE

DAVID S. KENNEDY, Chief Judge.

On November 17, 1989, this court made oral findings of fact and conclusions of law in open court in accordance with Bankr. Rule 7052 arising out of the motion of Walter and Jimmye Davis, the above-named debtors, seeking to amend their confirmed chapter 13 plan pursuant to § 1329 of the Bankruptcy Code to allow them an opportunity to cure a postconfirmation economic default in payments secured by their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re SimpkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  2. In Re McCollumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1987
  3. In Re ParkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1985
  4. Matter of CanipeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1982
  5. In Re ManningsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jones v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (In Re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
  2. In The Matter Of Josephine M. MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re: Dwight Nichols and Peggy Nichols, Debtors. Americredit Financial Services, Inc., Creditor-Appellant v. Dwight Nichols and Peggy Nichols, Debtors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. In Re GadlenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1990
  5. In Re BereolosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API