Legal Opinion
Saunders v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 18, 2003No. 03-1357PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Philip A. Saunders appeals a Tax Court decision that found deficiencies and penalties due for his 1993 and 1994 tax years. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules *495of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue issued Saunders a notice of deficiency for tax years 1993 and 1994, after the Commissioner disallowed deductions associated with Saunders’s former residence in Cleveland. The Commissioner concluded, inter alia, that Saunders…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grant v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- William D. Zack v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Stephen Bolaris and Valerie H. Bolaris v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Leonard Charles Ekman Kaye Layne Ekman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Robert E. Holmes and Carolyn S. Holmes v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Losantiville Country Club v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Carlos Langston & Pamela Langston v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
- O'Connell v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011