Legal Opinion
William D. Zack v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 21, 2002No. 00-2375PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
William D. Zack challenges the determination made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that Zack is liable (1) for income tax deficiencies for the tax years 1985 and 1986 based upon unreported income, and (2) for additions to tax for fraud and substantial understatement of tax with regard to the deficiencies for those years. Although Zack does not contend that his income tax returns for 1985 and 1986 were accurate, he argues that the amount of his unreported income was substantially offset by the bribes that he had paid to third parties in order to obtain work…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- In Re: Daniel Fordu, Debtor. Harold A. Corzin v. Julie A. ForduCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Grover Hill Grain Co. v. Baughman-Oster, Inc., Defendant-Third Party Champion Screw Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Paul F. Gray, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Estate of Frank Branson, Deceased Mary M. March v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Jorge Nicolas AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- BDT Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. $242,484.00Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. MarekCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.