Legal Opinion

United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Runnels

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1978No. 1-378A55PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, J.

Defendant-appellant United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau) appeals from an entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appéllee Bruce R. Runnels (Runnels).

The sole issue on appeal concerns the legality of a proration clause which effectively reduces an insurer’s liability on any one policy below that mandated by our uninsured motorist statute, IND. CODE-27-7-5-1. Said statute provides, in pertinent part:

“Sec. 1. No automobile liability or motor vehicle liability policy or insurance insuring against loss resulting from liability imposed by law for bodily injury or death…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Grody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Grody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Patton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Simpson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Collins v. McKinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Paint Shuttle, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Lafary v. LafaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Libdy v. Companion Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API