United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Runnels
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, J.
Defendant-appellant United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau) appeals from an entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appéllee Bruce R. Runnels (Runnels).
The sole issue on appeal concerns the legality of a proration clause which effectively reduces an insurer’s liability on any one policy below that mandated by our uninsured motorist statute, IND. CODE-27-7-5-1. Said statute provides, in pertinent part:
“Sec. 1. No automobile liability or motor vehicle liability policy or insurance insuring against loss resulting from liability imposed by law for bodily injury or death…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Grody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Grody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Patton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Simpson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Collins v. McKinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Paint Shuttle, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lafary v. LafaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Libdy v. Companion Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.