Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lawrence Warehouse Co. v. Rudio Lumber Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1965No. 9556Published

1DissentDunlap, District Judge

(dissenting) :

I am unable to concur in the opinion of the court.

Since prior to 1895, the procedure provided for by Revised Statutes, Section 4297 (now Idaho Code § 8-411), as interpreted by this court in 1898, in the case of Raft River Land and Cattle Co. v. Langford, 6 Idaho 30, 51 P. 1027, has been the established rule of procedure followed by the courts and parties litigant in preliminary injunction matters when a hearing on the merits was desired by the party opposing the injunction.

That procedure provides for a full hearing on the merits if the required notice is given. The statute is as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sims v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Unity Light & Power Company v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Raft River Land & Cattle Co. v. LangfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API