Legal Opinion

Arundel Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 7, 1934No. F-381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice

The plaintiff is a Maryland corporation engaged in the contracting business. An act of Congress approved June 29, 1922 (42 Stat. 709), authorized the expenditure of a specified appropriation under the direction of the Secretary of War for the construction of a water supply conduit for the District of Columbia. The conduit for which plans and specifications were prepared was to extend from above Great Falls, Maryland, to a designated point near the influent chamber to Dalecarlia Beservoir, a distance of nine miles.

Public advertisement was made, soliciting proposals to construct the conduit in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Day v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Luis Ríos v. Puerto Rico Cement Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946
  2. Ríos v. Puerto Rico Cement Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API