Gibson v. State

The plaintiff in error was 'convicted of the offense of obstructing legal process. His motion for a new trial was overruled. The bill of exceptions complains of the judgment over*30ruling this motion, and also of the overruling of his demurrers to .the indictment, his right to complain of the last-named judgment .having been preserved by exceptions pedente lite.

1. The indictment charged the accused and another with obstructing legal process, for that they did, on a named day, “unlawfully and with force and arms, knowingly and wilfully obstruct and oppose H. H. Smallwood, legal constable of said…