Legal Opinion

Marriage of Holznagel v. Holznagel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1985No. C4-84-1127, C0-84-2209Published

1Opinion of the Court

369 N.W.2d 344 (1985)

In re the Marriage of Lucille HOLZNAGEL, Appellant,

v.

Wayne HOLZNAGEL, Respondent.

Nos. C4-84-1127, C0-84-2209.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 18, 1985.

Donald C. Erickson, Johnson, Fredin, Killen, Thibodeau & Seiler, P.A., Duluth, for appellant.

Wayne Holznagel, pro se.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and FORSBERG, JJ.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is a consolidation of two appeals arising from the property settlement in a dissolution proceeding. Appellant appeals from an order modifying property distribution and debt allocation and from an order…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kirby v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Marriage of Bjorke v. BjorkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Kluge v. KlugeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Steel v. SteelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API