Legal Opinion

Steel v. Steel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 1975No. 45439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from the order and judgment of the district court awarding defendant $6,000 as her equitable share of the proceeds from the sale of the parties’ homestead. We affirm, but remand for the reasons hereinafter stated.

Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1958. They have one minor son. In 1971 the parties were divorced and, pursuant to a stipulation, the plaintiff-husband was awarded the couple’s home and custody of the child. The home was sold in April 1972. The parties were remarried in May 1972 and, with the proceeds from the sale of the home, purchased another home in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hafner v. HafnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tomscak v. TomscakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Cadle v. CadleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Marriage of Holznagel v. HolznagelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Cadle v. CadleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Marriage of Holznagel v. HolznagelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API