United States v. Archuleta

OPINION OF THE COURT

JOHNSTON, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial com*506posed of officer members of one specification of larceny in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ], The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for six months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private E1.

Although the appellant has asserted numerous errors, only one merits discussion: whether the military judge erred in applying Military Rule of…