Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Sumter Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Wallace, J., Sumter, March, 1892. This was an action by Reuben N. Hicks against the Sumter Cotton Mills, commenced in May, 1890.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McGowan.

This action was brought by the plaintiff for damages against the defendant corporation, for personal injuries received while in the discharge of his duties as an employee in the said mills. The complaint states that on or about May 26, 1888, the plaintiff was engaged in the service of said defendant corporation, and required to do service as an employee, whenever and wherever thereto directed by the manager, D. James Winn; that while engaged in such employment, the plaintiff was directed by the said manager to go upon a high…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. American Foundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Green v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  3. Bennett v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  4. Herbert v. ParhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  5. Mulligan v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API