Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Dyco Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 10, 1989No. 61637PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
This appeal arises from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, one of three defendants sued by Appellants, a group of working interest owners in the Yowell No. 1-26 natural gas well located in Roger Mills County. Panhandle is an interstate pipeline company that purchases natural gas and transports it through a pipeline system in interstate commerce. Other defendants in the trial court were El Paso Natural Gas Company and Dyco Petroleum Corporation. 1 Appellants alleged in their petition that Panhandle and El Paso were…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Republic Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Edmondson v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Heiman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Krug v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Benham v. PlotnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.