Legal Opinion
Roswell Drainage Dist. v. Parker
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 21, 1931No. 469PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
This is an action at law brought by Gerald Parker, Fred L. Dickey and J. Gist Search against the Roswell drainage district on certain negotiable bonds and interest coupons issued by it.
The district is a quasi-municipal corporation created under chapter 84, N. M. Sess. Laws 1912. This act has been amended in certain particulars not material here. The amended act appears as sections 40-101 to 40-187, N. M. Comp. St. 1929. The provisions of such act pertinent to this inquiry are set out in marginal note 1.
*795The trial court rendered a general judgment for plaintiffs for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Andrews v. PondSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Ross v. DuvalSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Scotland County v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cairo v. ZaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Divide Creek Irr. Dist. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Traphagen v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- McWhorter v. Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.