Hygiene Fire Protection District v. Board of County Commissioners
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Judge RUSSEL
dissenting.
The Hygiene Fire Protection District wants to condemn private property and build a firehouse there. Boulder County resists because the firehouse would disrupt a plan that the county adopted under the Planned Unit Development Act of 1972 (PUD Act), sections 24-67-101 to -108, C.R.S.2008. The issue is whether Hygiene Fire must obtain the county’s permission.
The majority concludes that the answer is no. It declares that, as a public entity, Hygiene Fire is exempt from an enforcement provision in the PUD Act, section 24-67-106(3)(b), C.R.S.2008. From that premise, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stamp v. Vail Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- MacOn Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. MacOn-bibb County Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.