Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hygiene Fire Protection District v. Board of County Commissioners

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2008No. 07CA2354Published

1Dissent

Judge RUSSEL

dissenting.

The Hygiene Fire Protection District wants to condemn private property and build a firehouse there. Boulder County resists because the firehouse would disrupt a plan that the county adopted under the Planned Unit Development Act of 1972 (PUD Act), sections 24-67-101 to -108, C.R.S.2008. The issue is whether Hygiene Fire must obtain the county’s permission.

The majority concludes that the answer is no. It declares that, as a public entity, Hygiene Fire is exempt from an enforcement provision in the PUD Act, section 24-67-106(3)(b), C.R.S.2008. From that premise, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stamp v. Vail Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. MacOn Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. MacOn-bibb County Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API