Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. D. M.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 14, 2012No. A149499 2010802921, 2010802922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Mother appeals the juvenile court’s decision to continue to exercise jurisdiction over her two children, I and A. When jurisdiction was first established, mother stipulated to the allegation that she had, at times, failed to provide adequate supervision of the children. At a subsequent review hearing, the court concluded, over mother’s assertion to the contrary, that the condition underlying the stipulated allegation persisted. We reverse.

The parties agree on most of the legal principles involved in this case. The juvenile court has jurisdiction over a case “involving a person who is under 18…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. C. Z.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. S. T. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. N. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Department of Human Services v. S. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Department of Human Services v. S. D. ICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Department of Human Services v. J. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Department of Human Services v. A. R. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API