Department of Human Services v. J. M.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Father appeals from a judgment of the juvenile court after a permanency hearing, assigning error to the court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the jurisdictional petition and to the court’s change in the permanency plan for his two young children, J and S, from reunification to adoption. We reverse.
The historical facts are undisputed. J was born on November 6, 2008, and S was born on August 5, 2011. The Department of Human Services (DHS) has been involved with the family and has provided services at least since 2008, when the agency began making assessments of mother based on reports of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. N. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Department of Human Services v. D. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Department of Human Services v. A. R. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
3Cited by15 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. G. N.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Department of Human Services v. L. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Dep't of Human Servs. v. C. A. M. (In re M. S. M.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Department of Human Services v. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Department of Human Services v. J. B. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.