Vaughan Machine Co. v. Stanton Tanning Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Manchester in a proceeding hy motion for a judgment. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion, of the Court.
The Vaughan Machine Company filed its motion against Marion H. Chalkley, trading under the firm name of the Stanton Tanning Company, in the Corporation Court of the city of Manchester, asking judgment upon a negotiable note given by the defendant company to it for the sum of $617.73, with interest, dated April 23, 1903, and payable one year after date. There was a judgment for the defendant, and the case is before us upon a writ of error sued out by the Vaughan Machine Company.
The case presented upon the record is as follows: The Stanton Tanning…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hannibal Railroad v. SwiftSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Cromer's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
- Seaboard & Roanoke Railroad v. Joyner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. SnowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Caple's AdmimistratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
- Ratcliffe v. WalkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Southern Railway Co. v. BaptistSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
- Higgins v. WhitmoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.