Legal Opinion

Barnett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 2003No. 24776PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERRY L. MONTGOMERY, Presiding Judge.

David Barnett (Movant) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Taney County denying his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside or correct a prior judgment and sentence for ineffective assistance of counsel. Movant contends, in two subparts, that his defense counsel at trial failed to object to the trial court’s verbal instruction to the jury that it return with a unanimous verdict and also that his counsel failed to request an instruction under MAI-CR3d 312.10. We affirm.

A complete review of the facts can be found in State v. Barnett, 16 S.W.3d 699…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. CoppleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Goudeau v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Turner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. RONALD R. SPRADLING, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API