Legal Opinion
Laidlow v. Hariton MacHinery Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 6, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
762 A.2d 311 (2000)
335 N.J. Super. 330
Rudolph LAIDLOW and Jean Laidlow, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HARITON MACHINERY CO., INC., and Advanced Metallurgy AMI-DDC, Inc., Defendants-Respondents/Cross-Appellants, and
Richard Portman, Defendant-Respondent,
Jay Hill Industries, Inc., United Engineering and Foundry Co. Inc. Air Wire/Doduco, Urse Inc., Wean Inc., Barto Inc., Division of Technitrol, United Engineering, Inc., Foundry Inc., Danieli United, a Division of United Foundry, Inc., Joseph Yasenka, individually and t/a Jay Hill Industries, an unincorporated entity, Defendants.
Superior Court of New…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Laidlow v. Hariton MacH. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Graure v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Agurto v. GuhrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.