Legal Opinion
Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 22, 2003PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
COLEMAN, J.
The critical issue in this appeal is whether an employer’s conduct in failing to cure hazardous conditions in violation of a directive issued by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), coupled with its intentional deception of OSHA, constitutes an “intentional wrong” under the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Based on this Court’s holding in Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161, 501 A.2d 505 (1985), the trial court dismissed the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Laidlow v. Hariton MacH. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Laidlow v. Hariton MacHinery Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Barcello v. BielSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Crippen v. Central Jersey Concrete Pipe Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Liberty Surplus Insurance v. AmorosoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Van Dunk v. Reckson Associates Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Kibler v. Roxbury Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Bove v. Akpharma Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- FERMAINTT EX REL. ESTATE OF LAWLOR v. McWane, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.