Legal Opinion
Bridwell v. Mulder
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 17, 2010No. 05-09-01339-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice FILLMORE.
Appellant Phillip Bridwell, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice appearing pro se before this Court, appeals the trial court’s order of dismissal •with prejudice for want of prosecution. We affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing Bridwell’s claims with prejudice.
Background
Bridwell filed the underlying lawsuit on August 27, 2007 against Douglas D. Mulder, an attorney appellant claimed to be his counsel, Patrick Kennard, David Wells, and Wells Bail Bonds. Pursuant to chapter 14 of the civil practice and remedies code entitled “Inmate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Villarreal v. San Antonio Truck & EquipmentTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- WMC Mortgage Corp. v. Starkey, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Brewer v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Maldonado v. Puente, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chead Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2020
- Anthony A. Rieder Ed Rapee III And Cadbury Solutions, LLC AND Kenny Woods v. Alan Meeker and CQuentia Series, LLC AND Anthony A. Rieder Ed Rapee III And Cadbury Solutions, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021
- Ex Parte: Rowe, James Laray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Ronroyal Owens v. Jerry Alexander and Billy D. Wyatt, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2019