Stauffer v. Navient Solutions, LLC
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge
Plaintiff Crystal Stauffer (“Stauffer”) commenced the instant action against defendant Navient Solutions, LLC (“Na-vient”),1 under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227. Stauffer contends that Navient initiated several calls to her personal cellular telephone in violation of the Act. (Doc. 1). Before the court is Navient’s motion (Doc. 33) for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The court will grant the motion.
I. Factual Background & Procedural History2
On April 20, 2010, Stauffer applied for federal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Leyse v. Bank of America National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Malibu Media, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Adams v. Hanover Foods CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Clouser v. Hanover Foods CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Evans v. Capital Blue CrossDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.