Legal Opinion
Fleet v. Pulsar Construction Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 15, 1988PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a special proceeding for judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, Paul Weinberg, a 50% shareholder in the corporation, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hentel, J.), dated May 2, 1988, as, after a hearing, denied his motion for disqualification of Harold S. Elovich as attorney for petitioning shareholder Thomas P. Fleet, and the petitioner Thomas P. Fleet cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion for disqualification of Phillips & Weiner, as attorneys for Weinberg.
Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re HofAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Colonie Hill, Ltd. v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Flushing Savings Bank v. FSB Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Grover v. VirdiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by14 opinions
- Plotnik v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Entertainment Partners Group, Inc. v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- In re LichtensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Mancheski v. Gabelli Group Capital Partners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Severino v. DiIorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.