Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. Subsequent Injury Fund
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Chief Judge.
Employer appeals from a summary judgment by the Workers’ Compensation Division (the WCD) dismissing its claim against the New Mexico Subsequent Injury Fund (the Fund) on the ground that employer had not filed a certificate of preexisting impairment prior to worker’s subsequent injury. The Fund cross-appeals that portion of the WCD’s order alternatively denying it summary judgment based upon employer’s failure to provide the Fund ninety days’ notice of its intent to file a claim. We reverse the WCD on both issues.
FACTS
Worker suffered an accidental work-related injury…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Wilson v. New Mexico Lumber & Timber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Ferguson v. New Mexico State Highway CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Madrid v. St. Joseph HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Southard v. FoxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Aragon v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Wegner v. Hair ProductsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Allen v. Amoco Production Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.