Legal Opinion

Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. Subsequent Injury Fund

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1990No. 11595, 11667PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Chief Judge.

Employer appeals from a summary judgment by the Workers’ Compensation Division (the WCD) dismissing its claim against the New Mexico Subsequent Injury Fund (the Fund) on the ground that employer had not filed a certificate of preexisting impairment prior to worker’s subsequent injury. The Fund cross-appeals that portion of the WCD’s order alternatively denying it summary judgment based upon employer’s failure to provide the Fund ninety days’ notice of its intent to file a claim. We reverse the WCD on both issues.

FACTS

Worker suffered an accidental work-related injury…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Wilson v. New Mexico Lumber & Timber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Ferguson v. New Mexico State Highway CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Madrid v. St. Joseph HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Southard v. FoxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Aragon v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Wegner v. Hair ProductsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Allen v. Amoco Production Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API