Frost v. Grimmer

This was a suit by Grimmer, plaintiff below, to recover for certain plans and specifications which he, as an architect, had prepared for Frost, defendant below. The plaintiff declared on a contract for 2 1/2 per cent. of the cost of the building for making plans and specifications, and for 1 1/2 per cent for superintendence. It was the defendant's contention that he employed the plaintiff to make said plans and specifications and superintend the erection of said building, conditioned upon the sale by defendant of $31,500 worth of bonds of the Cane Rice Belt Irrigation Company, and conditioned…