Legal Opinion
Goldman v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 23, 1924No. 2936PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.
This suit was filed by the state in behalf of itself and for the benefit of Delta county improvement district No. 2 to collect approximately $2,000 in delinquent taxes. It'is alleged that Delta county improvement district No. 2 was formed by authority of what is commonly known as the Canales Act, passed in 1918 for the reclamation of swamp lands. This act appears in Texas Complete Statutes of 1920 as articles 5107 — 267 to 5107 — 276. The district was organized under the provisions of chapter 2, title 83, of the Revised Civil Statutes. It is also alleged that after the organization of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Graham v. City of GreenvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- City of El Paso v. RuckmanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Parker v. Harris County Drainage Dist. No. 2Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Marsters v. Umpqua Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kuhlmann v. Drainage Dist. No. 12 of Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Morton v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Armstead v. Hopkins County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 3 Ex Rel. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Armstead v. Hopkins County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 3 Ex Rel. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928