Legal Opinion

In re P.D.R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 2012No. 283PA11PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Justice.

The parental rights of respondent-mother to her three children were terminated after a trial in which she waived her right to counsel. *534The Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing respondent to waive counsel because the trial court failed to conduct an adequate inquiry under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1242. We hold that N.C.G.S. § 15A-1242 has no application in termination of parental rights (“TPR”) proceedings. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the Court of Appeals.

I

In October 2008 the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fowler v. ValencourtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. In Re the Summons Issued to Ernst & Young, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re A.Y.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. In re P.D.R.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. In Re PdrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. In re K.M.W.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API