Legal Opinion

State v. Cobb

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 28, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] We are called upon here to answer this question: In applying 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1252(2)(A) (Supp.2003), 1 must a defendant be afforded the opportunity to have a jury determine whether the defendant’s “serious criminal history” warrants a sentence in the upper tier if the nature and seriousness of the defendant’s crime alone do not warrant a sentence in the upper tier? See U.S. CONST, amend. VI; United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).

[¶ 2] Because we conclude that the court was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Yervin K. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. State v. HeweySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Brian NicholsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. State v. SchofieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. State of Maine v. Andrew B. BeanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  4. State of Maine v. Andrew B. BeanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API