Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corp.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentGiven, Judge
Being clearly of the opinion that an implied flowage easement was created in the circumstances of the conveyance of the 2.9 acres from Stuart Lakes, Inc. to Doctor Henderson, later acquired by plaintiff, and that plain*656tiff, the present owner of the 2.9 acres, is estopped to deny the existence of such an easement, I am forced to this dissent.
Doctor Henderson was one of the promoters and “associates” and was “active in the affairs of Stuart Lakes, Inc.” At the time of the conveyance to Doctor Henderson, in fact long before, he had full knowledge of the proposed plan to raise the level of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Norfolk & W. R. v. PerdueWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Boyd v. WoolwineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ange v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Akers v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
- Miller v. SkaggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.