Farrell v. Lockhart
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
In the month of February, 1905, James Farrell, plaintiff in error, as owner of the Cliff lode mining claim, situated in the Uintah mining district, Summit County, Utah, made application in the United States land office at Salt Lake City for a patent, and published the notice required by Jaw. The defendant in error, as the administrator' of the estate of John G. Rhodin, filed an adverse claim based upon the location by Rhodin of the ground as the Divide lode mining claim. There after, pursuant to Rév. Stat., § 2326, this action was brought in a court of the State of Utah by the administrator…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Snell v. . LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- White v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Black v. Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Brown v. GurneySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Ickes v. Virginia-Colorado Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Swanson v. SearsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Battle v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.