Legal Opinion · Dissent

Buchholz v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 20, 1957No. 17811Published

1DissentJustice Frantz

I am impelled to dissent. It seems to me that the law enunciated by the majority of this court in effect holds that the driver of a motor vehicle crosses railroad tracks at a public crossing at his peril; that evidence of cautionary measures taken by such a driver over the tracks is of no avail, and does not make the question of whether he acted as a reasonably prudent man would have acted under the circumstances one for resolution by the jury.

Buchholz sued the railroad company to recover damages for the value of a truck demolished at a crossing collision in Julesburg, Colorado, and for loss…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Phillips v. Denver City Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Nichols v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Gossard v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Millington v. HiedloffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API