Buchholz v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Frantz
I am impelled to dissent. It seems to me that the law enunciated by the majority of this court in effect holds that the driver of a motor vehicle crosses railroad tracks at a public crossing at his peril; that evidence of cautionary measures taken by such a driver over the tracks is of no avail, and does not make the question of whether he acted as a reasonably prudent man would have acted under the circumstances one for resolution by the jury.
Buchholz sued the railroad company to recover damages for the value of a truck demolished at a crossing collision in Julesburg, Colorado, and for loss…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Phillips v. Denver City Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Nichols v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Gossard v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Millington v. HiedloffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.