Legal Opinion
Sunbury Wire Rope Manufacturing Co. v. United States Steel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 15, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 16933PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIM, District Judge.
The Roebling Securities Corporation seeks dismissal of this antitrust action as to it on the ground of improper venue. Roebling, a New Jersey corporation, had been licensed to do business in Pennsylvania, with its registered office in Philadelphia. Several months before being served with process in the present action Roebling obtained a certificate of withdrawal from Pennsylvania, thus revoking its license to do business in this state. Roebling has done no business in Pennsylvania since 1952, two years before this action was brought.
Under these circumstances neither the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Seaboard Terminals Corp. v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Electric Theater Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
- Seaboard Terminals Corporation v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Lipp v. National Screen Service Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hyde Construction Company v. Koehring CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1969
- National Auto Brokers Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Antonana v. Ore Steamship CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956