Legal Opinion

King v. King

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The plaintiff-respondent, Marguerite E. King, and the defendant-appellant, Homer H. King, were formerly husband and wife. In 1924, they conveyed to Lucy C. Pennington, as trustee for them, certain real property in Portland, Multnomah county, Oregon, which they held as tenants by the entirety. They were divorced in the year 1930. On December 18, 1934, Lucy C. Pennington, at the instance of the appellant, conveyed this property to his sister, Ollie K. Shields. The property is improved with an apartment house which was occupied and managed by the appellant during the period beginning June 12,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. WolfardOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Pitts v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wragg v. WraggSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ProtrkaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Valladee v. ValladeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Doty v. EdmisonOregon Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API