Legal Opinion
Holender v. Fred Cammann Productions, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 18, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lupiano, J.
Plaintiff in his complaint alleges an agreement entered into by plaintiff and the defendants in November, 1977, whereby defendants agreed to pay plaintiff upon completion of a certain motion picture, 25 % of the “markup” or gross profits payable for production services to be supplied by defendants in the making of such film, which agreement was *234thereafter amended to reduce the compensation payable to plaintiff to 12y2 % and that, the picture having been completed, the defendants refused to pay this compensation, although due and duly demanded. In their answer,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moskowitz v. GarlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Dura v. Walker, Hart & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Crowley's Milk Co. v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- HAWLEY FUEL COALMART, INC. v. STEAG HANDEL, GmbH.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Vine v. John Manville Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Onbank & Trust Co. v. James P. Burr Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Keenan v. Artintype Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1989
- L. I v. E. T. R.New York City Family Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.