Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appelle v. Octavio Barocio, United States of America v. Moises Gomez, AKA "Santiago,"

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1997No. 96-10207Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

122 F.3d 1074

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appelle,

v.

Octavio BAROCIO, Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee.

v.

Moises GOMEZ, aka "Santiago," Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 96-10207, 96-10237.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 5, 1997.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Robert ManningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Lewis M. Dischner, United States of America v. Carl W. MathisenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Gregorio De Jesus Mares, United States of America v. Alfredo Martinez-OsunaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API