Legal Opinion
State v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 3, 2004No. A03-1197PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*298OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
A jury found David Wright guilty of one count of illegal possession of a firearm and two counts of second-degree assault. Wright argues that the district court abused its discretion in admitting as excited utterances statements made in a 911 call and statements that the complainants made to police who responded to the 911 call. Wright also argues that the statement he made in response to police force used to subdue him was not voluntary and should not have been admitted; that the court abused its discretion in ruling that he could be impeached with his prior convictions…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. James Saget, Also Known as HeshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Bray v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.