Latham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TEAGUE, Judge.
William R. Latham and John W. Winston, appellants, after a joint trial with four other persons, were convicted and punished by a jury because they violated a provision of the statute governing the sale of securities, which law is more commonly known as the Texas Blue Sky Law. See Art. 581-29(C), V.A.C.S. Pursuant to the recommendation of the jury, the trial court ordered each appellant placed on probation for six months.
Appellants assert in their respective appellate briefs that the trial court committed reversible error when it refused their respective and timely urged…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boatright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Stark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Overton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Chappell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Yanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.