Legal Opinion

Chappell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1993No. 71025PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of capital murder pursuant to Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 19.-03(a)(2).1 The jury affirmatively answered the two issues submitted pursuant to Tex. Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 37.071, § 2(b).2 Punishment was assessed at death. Tex. Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 37.071, § 2(e). Appeal to this Court is automatic. Tex. Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 37.071, § 2(h). We will reverse.

I

As appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, we will dispense with a recitation of any facts unnecessary to the resolution of the point of error…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Sewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Sauceda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Rey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. State v. Kelley, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  5. Sands v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API