Legal Opinion
Elmwood Plantation, Inc. v. Ruud Water Heater Division
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 2, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-2509PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MENTZ, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The plaintiff, Walbrook, Ltd. (Walbrook), in its capacity as an excess insurer of Ruud Water Heater Division, City Investing Company (Ruud), has brought this action against National Union Fire Insurance Company (National), Ruud’s primary insurer. Succinctly stated, Walbrook is seeking the recovery of amounts allegedly paid by Walbrook but owed by National in satisfaction of a judgment rendered, in favor of Elmwood Plantation, Inc., (Elmwood) and against their mutual insured, Ruud.
This Court held a non-jury trial on September 12, 1985…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Philippe v. Browning Arms Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. SalemiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
- Succession of FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Daly v. AbramsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bentley v. Industrial Fire Protection, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Elmwood Plantation, Inc. v. Ruud Water Heater DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Elmwood Plantation, Inc. v. Ruud Water Heater DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987