Legal Opinion

Elmwood Plantation, Inc. v. Ruud Water Heater Division

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1987No. 86-3090PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

This is a suit between a primary and an excess insurer. The issue is whether a primary insurer is obligated to contribute to a settlement an amount in excess of its policy limit where the settlement is in lump sum form, and where the primary and excess insurers made no separate agreement to allocate specific portions of the lump sum to payment of the plaintiff’s judicial interest, court costs, and attorneys’ fees. The primary insurer refused to contribute more than its $1,000,000 policy limit to the $4.5 million dollar settlement. The excess insurers, wishing to conclude…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philippe v. Browning Arms Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Soprano v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  3. Elmwood Plantation v. Ruud Water Heater Div.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Travelers Indemnity v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London & CompaniesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1983
  5. Elmwood Plantation, Inc. v. Ruud Water Heater DivisionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Carrier v. Louisiana Pigment Co., LPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Elmwood Plantation, Inc. v. Ruud Water Heater DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API